Nuke Bill goof-up: minimum turns maximum

I generally don’t set much store with what the communist parties in India say or do – the only good thing about them is that they have a basically clean party structure and as a group, have better moral standards vis-a-vis any other group of politicians – centre, right or fundamentalists.

And I certainly didn’t approve or like their opposition to the Civil Nuclear Agreement (123 Agreement) with the US [http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/americas/123-agreement-win-win-situation-for-both-sides/240399/Article1-240396.aspx].  But their present opposition to the Nuclear Liability Bill seems justified.

How can the blinkered Government of India try to pull such a stunt on us?  Is this a Government ‘for the people’ or actually ‘feck the people’?

As per this report "Nuke Bill goof-up : minimum turns maximum", in the original draft -

• the 300 million SDRs was the “floor” and not the “cap” in case of accidents, and
• the liability was to be fixed on the “operator” and not the “supplier”.

If I was the Prime Minister, I would definitely ask for the resignation of the arsehales who modified the draft Bill, for this attempt to swindle the people of India.
:-X

If this was China, I think the culprit would have been sentenced to death
(Now, how did I link to a newer post from an older post?)
:-B

---